Responsa for Bava Batra 305:2
ההוא דקנו מיניה אתא לקמיה דרב הונא אמר מאי איעבד לך דלא אקנית כדמקנו אינשי
There was a certain [man]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who, while on his death-bed, had presented his estate to a stranger. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> from whom [symbolic] acquisition was taken, who came before R. Huna.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Desiring, on recovery, the return of his estate. ');"><sup>4</sup></span> [The latter] said, 'What can I do for you [in such a case] where you did not transfer possession as [other] people do?'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., cause to acquire'. Had he presented his estate without allowing symbolic acquisition to take place be could retract on recovery. After symbolic acquisition one has no right to withdraw. ');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
A. B must take an oath to the effect that he gave the money to his daughter while she was still living in peace and harmony with her husband, and thus be free from obligation. Since B's daughter was a rebellious wife she ought to be dealt with as such. I already wrote to you, while I was in Konstanze, my opinion regarding the law governing a rebellious wife. We follow the ordinance of the Geonim and permit her to keep all she brought to her husband as dowry (Nikse Zon Barzel), and whatever he brought is returned to him, nor is she entitled to the Ikkar ketubah; she is then to wait until either he consents to divorce her, or she decides to go back to him. If we suspect, however, that she does not dislike her husband but revolts against him because of financial considerations, or because her father, her mother, or her relatives induce her to quarrel with him, we take away from her even her dowry. In such a case we must follow the law in all its strictness and give all the possessions of the couple to the husband, for the ordinance of the Geonim mentioned above does not apply to the woman who rebels against her husband because she is persuaded to do so by others.
SOURCES: Cr. 93, 94; L. 327, 328; Mord. Ket. 186–7; cf. Mordecai Hagadol, p. 160d; Terumat Hadeshen 220; Isserlein, Pesakim 264.